Krytyka Prawa. Niezależne Studia nad Prawem

Ustawa o narodzie – czy na pewno jest to ustawa przemyślana? To manifest partyjny czy ustawa parlamentarna?

Huppert, Uri

Cleveland State University

332.34 KB

407 downloads

Abstract

The author offers an analysis of the controversial Israeli Nation-State Law of 2018 and B. Netanyahu’s involvement in its adoption. He claims that its ideas manifest Netanyahu’s desire to depart from the state-centred, social democratic, and liberal views advocated by Ben Gurion. This desire stems from his strong disagreement with Israel’s founder’s claim and belief that secularism is a guarantee that Israel does not fall into the same trap as the leaders of the bicentennial Crusades – which ultimately failed. The author of the paper makes an insightful comparison of this law with the contents of Point 13 of Thomas Woodrow Wilson’s 1918 plan – a docu-ment from exactly 100 years before, designed to shape Europe after victory in the war against Russia, Prussia, and Austria-Hungary, on whose lands an independent Polish state was to be established.

Metadata

Journal Krytyka Prawa. Niezależne Studia nad Prawem 
Volume 14 
Issue 1 
Issue date 4/2022 
Type Article 
Language pl
Pagination 111–132
DOI 10.7206/kp.2080-1084.511
ISSN 2080-1084
eISSN 2450-7938